HASSO HERING

A perspective from Oregon’s mid-Willamette Valley

Why is this overpass ramp still closed?

Written October 4th, 2024 by Hasso Hering

In 1939, the state Highway Department designed this as the west leg of the “North Thurston Street Ramp.” But ODOT closed it to the public about 25 years ago.

When the “Southern Pacific Railroad Overcrossing” in Albany was built in 1939, the state highway department provided it with  proper ramps to get on and off. Many years later, ODOT made one of the ramps off limits. It’s still closed, and the question is why.

The closure happened, if memory serves, around the time ODOT built the Pacific-Ninth Avenue couplet in 1998. And the rationale is lost in the mist of what now seems like the distant past.

The Albany police had their station on Jackson Street at the time, and they needed this ramp for quick responses to the central and western parts of town. So the ramp closure has an exception for “emergency vehicles.”

Now that the police station is on Pacific Boulevard, that exception is unnecessary, except that Linn County deputies might still need it if they respond from the sheriff’s office to emergencies south of Albany.

When the ramp was still available to the public, Albany drivers often found it useful as they evaded long delays at the Queen Avenue rail crossing by heading north to cross the tracks on the overpass instead. Since they have been barred from that shortcut, drivers unwilling to wait have had to make a one-block detour via Hill Street to get on Pacific.

This was designed as the west leg of the North Thurston Street Ramp when the overpass was built. Here, take a look at the 1939 plan for this feature.

 

It was a perfectly workable design that served Albany drivers for many years, once upon a time. It could do so again if the traffic closure was removed. (hh)





13 responses to “Why is this overpass ramp still closed?”

  1. TLH-ALB1 says:

    One for emergency vehicles. Two because of too many traffic accidents. Now days so the Police can sit and conduct traffic stops as they see ‘em happening. Keep it closed…too many idiots on the road…don’t need ‘em pulling out in front of someone.

  2. George Grenz says:

    I agree, please reopen the ramp!

  3. Rachel La Brasseur says:

    I have wondered the same thing for years!

  4. Julie H says:

    That on ramp was part of a great route I used often until it closed. I would love to see it reopen. Queen is always a mess and it would relieve traffic to have this alternate route open.

  5. Kevin says:

    That ramp changed sometime in the last 5+ years. I think it was right after the police station moved.

  6. Rich O. says:

    What was the speed limit and traffic volume in 1939 when that was designed? Not the same today and not a safe place to merge.
    Keep it closed.

  7. Sharon Konopa says:

    The reason to close the lane was because there was not a long enough lane to merge on to the overpass. Plus the school buses coming from the bus barn made it worse. ODOT wanted to close off the access from under the overpass and the council and ODOT finally agreed to keep it open for emergency access only. The buses were required to take Madison or Hill. Since the bus barn has moved then there is no longer that concern. But in my opinion, if it was reopened would create a safety issue to merge onto the overpass. There is a lot more traffic than 25 years ago!

  8. Jerry says:

    Looks like if the merge sign was replaced with a stop sign then it would be a typical side street. Then drivers would have to wait for an opening just like other intersections.

  9. chris j says:

    Yet another reason to keep the area free of increased pedestrian and residential use. The area was designed well for the remaining few homes along with light industrial use to keep the traffic flowing. The restricted area was needed because it is typical for an on or off ramp to have heavier traffic during certain hours. Maybe that is why the police department was moved out of the area. Driving by the shelter is hazardous for regular traffic so when the emergency responders need to access 9th going towards I-5 it would be an obstacle course.

  10. thomas earl cordier says:

    Did ODOT place the sign shown in the post?? The City Manager should instruct the new interim Albany traffic staff to request a sign change. Does ODOT really have the final say?
    Sharon’s post indicates the Council agreed–so now Council action should disagree and demand change

  11. A. Fast says:

    Drivers are able to merge just fine from the exact same position on the other side of the overpass with even less line of sight. Either close that one too or open them both

 

 
HH Today: A perspective from Oregon’s mid-Willamette Valley
Albany Albany City Council Albany council Albany downtown Albany housing Albany parks Albany Planning Commission Albany police Albany Post Office Albany Public Works Albany riverfront Albany Station Albany streets Albany traffic Albany urban renewal Amtrak apartments ARA Benton County bicycling bike lanes Bowman Park Bryant Park CARA climate change COVID-19 Cox Creek Cox Creek path Crocker Lane cumberland church cycling Dave Clark Path DEQ downtown Albany Edgewater Village Ellsworth Street bridge Highway 20 homeless housing Interstate 5 land use Linn County Millersburg Monteith Riverpark North Albany North Albany Road ODOT Oregon legislature Pacific Boulevard Pacific Power Portland & Western Queen Avenue Railroads Republic Services Riverside Drive Santiam Canal Scott Lepman Talking Water Gardens Tom Cordier Union Pacific urban renewal Water Avenue Waterfront Project Waverly Lake Willamette River


Copyright 2024. All Rights Reserved. Hasso Hering.
Website Serviced by Santiam Communications
Hasso Hering