A perspective from Oregon’s mid-Willamette Valley

Pot ordinance up for council vote

Written November 29th, 2015 by Hasso Hering

city hall nov 7 002

On Wednesday the Albany City Council will vote to ban the production, processing, and wholesale and retail selling of recreational marijuana within the city limits. This sets up an election next November in which opponents of recreational marijuana will want to vote yes and supporters will want to vote no. This may not be confusing to everyone, but it will be to some.

The council is scheduled to vote Wednesday on the first reading of an ordinance banning licensed commerce in recreational marijuana. Chances are the second reading and final council vote won’t come until the following week, when the council will meet again, on Dec. 7 and 9..

In any case, the ordinance says it “shall be referred” to Albany electors in the general election on Nov. 8, 2016. When that time comes, the marijuana question will be before Albany voters in a way opposite from the 2014 general election. Then, the question was whether to approve recreational marijuana businesses, and by a small margin Albany voters said yes. In 2016, the question will be whether to ban them.

Albany is planning to enact its ban before the start of 2016 because on Jan. 4, the Oregon Liquor Control Commission will start accepting license applications from recreational marijuana businesses. If the city notifies the OLCC of its ban before then, the agency will not accept applications.

As of a week ago, Linn County and most of its other cities had already notified the OLCC of their respective bans. Not on the list of prohibition jurisdictions were Scio, Sodaville and Tangent. Either those burgs are waiting until the last minute, like Albany, or they see a business opportunity and don’t want to mess it up. (hh)

3 responses to “Pot ordinance up for council vote”

  1. Ray Kopczynski says:

    I am already on record & camera saying I will vote “no” for the 1st reading of the ordinance — thereby carrying it over to the Monday, Dec. 7th council meeting. What will happen then is still up in the air.

  2. Casey Costa says:

    I just really can’t believe that in this day and age this is happening.

  3. Jim Engel says:

    Me thinks far too many copies of “Reefer Madness” are still circulating. I am one (APD 71-00) that can tell you that most any substance can be abused. Spray paint is one (huffers) for goodness sake & there has been no effort at all from the council to curtail sales. Same goes for Sterno…. Gasoline…. and the most socially accepted, embraced, condoned substance -wink, wink…ALCOHOL! The council sure hasn’t turned away a blind eye or up turned palm to receive the City’s share of OLCC funds!! Proper safeguards, proper record keeping, just a plain & simple means of dealing with a change in a societies norms is in order. NOT draconian, heavy handed measures..yatta, yatta. Please Albany City council, show us a even handed fair response! JE


HH Today: A perspective from Oregon’s mid-Willamette Valley
Albany Albany City Council Albany council Albany downtown Albany Fire Department Albany housing Albany parks Albany Planning Commission Albany police Albany Post Office Albany Public Works Albany riverfront Albany Station Albany streets Albany traffic Albany urban renewal apartments Benton County Benton County parks bicycling bike lanes Bowman Park Bryant Park CARA City of Albany climate change coronavirus COVID-19 Cox Creek Cox Creek path Crocker Lane cumberland church cycling Dave Clark Path DEQ downtown Albany Edgewater Village global warming gun control Highway 20 homeless housing Interstate 5 Linn County marijuana Millersburg North Albany Obama ODOT Oregon coast Oregon legislature Pacific Boulevard Pacific Power Portland & Western Republic Services Riverside Drive Santiam Canal Scott Lepman Talking Water Gardens The Banks Tom Cordier Union Pacific urban renewal Water Avenue Willamette River

Copyright 2022. All Rights Reserved. Hasso Hering.
Website Serviced by Santiam Communications
Hasso Hering