A perspective from Oregon’s mid-Willamette Valley

Protecting Albany airport from — what?

Written November 5th, 2013 by Hasso Hering
One segment of the new airport fence will go where the yellow tape is.

One segment of the new airport fence will go where the yellow tape is.









The city of Albany is having a new fence put up at the city airport because, well, the government says it must. And that requirement raises a question: Is it necessary?

The placement of the fence along the airport’s southeastern boundary prompted a discussion before the city council Monday. The city staff wants it built a little way inside the property, on the west side of Cox Creek, while the airport advisory commission fears this would signal a further shrinking of the airport, already reduced over the last 30 years by construction of the Linn County Fair and Expo Center and then a couple of hotels and a restaurant.

The council seemed willing to pass a resolution affirming the present airport boundary regardless of where the fence is placed. That should settle that, but what about the fence itself, seven feet tall with barbed wire on top? The city says it’s the second phase of fencing started in 2008. The cost this time: $253,000, 90 percent of which is paid by the Federal Aviation Administration.

The reason for this formidable fence: Improve security, presumably to keep out terrorists. But the new fence will have gaps where Cox Creek flows, so in the unlikely event that al-Qaida has an interest in hijacking a private plane at the Albany Airport, it’s hard to imagine the barbed wire will stop it. So, because the FAA says so, a quarter-million dollars is being needlessly spent. (hh)

Gordon L. Shadle:  Why should it shock anyone that Albany is spending an excessive amount on an unneeded fence? 90% of the money is “free.” We live in a city that spent $11,000,000 for a train station (sorry, the official name is Albany Multimodal Station) with a copper roof and $1,600,000 on a 1,586 sq. ft. outbuilding. The feds chipped in 80% of the funding for that wasteful project.  Albany will never turn down federal money if it’s “free.” Whether the spending passes the common sense test is irrelevant. The objective is the spending, not the need.

Actually, the “official name” is Albany Station. (hh)

One response to “Protecting Albany airport from — what?”

  1. Warren Beeson says:

    If memory serves, the airport fence building surge began as a response to the attacks of 9/11. I’m not sure why anyone felt small local airports constituted a real potential threat from terrorists but it was, and is, clearly nonsense. The non-existent threat now seems to have grown, requiring expenditures of millions of dollars throughout the country for no apparent benefit. The carrot/stick enticements of the Feds only increases their power and bloats the budget (deficit/debt). We simply cannot keep on doing this. Why can’t we, “Just say NO!”?


HH Today: A perspective from Oregon’s mid-Willamette Valley
Albany Albany Carousel Albany City Council Albany council Albany downtown Albany Fire Department Albany housing Albany parks Albany Planning Commission Albany police Albany Post Office Albany Public Works Albany riverfront Albany Station Albany streets Albany traffic Albany urban renewal Andy Olson Benton County Benton County parks bicycling bike lanes Bowman Park Bryant Park Calapooia River CARA City of Albany climate change coronavirus COVID-19 Cox Creek path Crocker Lane cumberland church cycling Dave Clark Path DEQ downtown Albany Edgewater Village global warming gun control Highway 20 Interstate 5 Kitzhaber Linn County marijuana medical marijuana Millersburg North Albany North Albany Road Obama ODOT Oregon coast Oregon legislature Pacific Power Portland & Western Republic Services Riverside Drive Santiam Canal Talking Water Gardens The Banks Tom Cordier Union Pacific urban renewal Water Avenue Willamette River

Copyright 2020. All Rights Reserved. Hasso Hering.
Website Serviced by Santiam Communications
Hasso Hering