A planning committee in Benton County has been looking for the best feasible route for a potential bikeway between Albany and Corvallis. A couple of weeks ago it picked three alternatives for closer attention. But two of the three look impractical, at least to me.
On March 22, this panel of “stakeholders” will meet again, at noon in the public library in Corvallis. The members want to review the three preliminary routes some more. If they want a suggestion, mine is to drop two of the alternatives and concentrate on the third, a separate path alongside the southeast side of the Albany-Corvallis Highway.
One of the alternatives would have cyclists use a roundabout route of bike lanes along county roads including Gibson Hill, Independence, Metge and Granger before connecting with Highway 99W. It’s hilly and much too indirect. It’s a great route for Sunday rides, but regular commuters would not use it except under duress.
The other alternative goes along the Willamette River upstream from Takena Landing. It would be scenic and quiet. But it would most likely also conflict with wetlands and farms. And during the winter when the Willamette runs high, I wonder whether that route could be used at all.
That leaves the Highway 20 alternative. It would require bike traffic to cross the highway to get to the south side at Scenic Drive. That is, unless the county and Albany abandoned their agreement, affirmed just a few weeks ago, to build the Albany leg of the bikeway where it has been planned for several years. See the illustration below. (You can look up the Benton County alternatives and meeting schedule here.)
The advantage of placing the bikeway on the south side of the highway is that it’s the shortest distance between Albany and Corvallis and the terrain is level. But if the Albany leg materializes where it’s planned, then a signal at Scenic Drive would be desirable to allow cyclists to get across the highway. On second thought, it might be better to scratch that plan, put the Albany leg south of the highway too, starting at Takena Landing, where a signal already exists (at North Albany Road).
An open house is scheduled April 5 before the stakeholders meet again on April 25, when they hope to reach a recommendation to the county board of commissioners. The way it looks to me, the best choice is to recommend the Highway 20 alternative and then see if it can be built at a reasonable cost. If not, then let’s forget the whole idea. (hh)