HASSO HERING

A perspective from Oregon’s mid-Willamette Valley

Passenger rail planning on slow track

Written February 9th, 2013 by
Portland & Western locomotives wait on the Albany rail bridge. Can you imagine the bridge serving fast passsenger trains?

Portland & Western locomotives wait on the Albany rail bridge. Can you imagine the bridge serving fast passsenger trains?

You won’t be surprised to learn that under federal guidance, Oregon continues to plod along slowly in trying to find the best way to enhance passenger rail transportation up and down the Willamette Valley.

The effort began 2011 with federal grants and the hiring of consultants to conduct an environmental assessment of various routes that enhanced train service might take. First though, criteria had to be developed against which the various alternatives could be judged. Now you and I sitting around a table over a beer could develop the criteria in half an hour, then spend another hour settling on the routes. But government works at a more leisurely pace.

On the last day of January, meeting in Salem, the governor’s rail passenger leadership council decided that several possible routes would get additional evaluations. This will take months, and the leadership group won’t get the next set of recommendations till some time this summer.

Albany Mayor Sharon Konopa, a member of the group, reports that the routes now being evaluated include one from Eugene to Corvallis on the west side of the valley, continuing from Corvallis to Albany and then north. That would probably entail bypassing Albany Station, because stopping there and turning trains around — or at least putting the engine on the other end — would take too long. (Also, can you imagine fast passenger trains rumbling across the 1926 Willamette River railroad bridge at Albany?) But since the west side routing thorugh Corvallis would cost more travel time, why even consider it when the goal is faster service between Portland and Eugene?

The federal process of making decisions — followed here because federal grants are involved and the final decision will come from the Federal Railroad Administration — requires that all possible alternatives be considered. That’s why it takes so long, and why the obvious solution — double-tracking the existing main line — has to compete with all the rest. (hh)


Posted in: Commentary
Tags: ,



Comments are closed.

 

 
HH Today: A perspective from Oregon’s mid-Willamette Valley
Albany Albany Carousel Albany City Council Albany council Albany downtown Albany Fire Department Albany housing Albany parks Albany Planning Commission Albany police Albany Post Office Albany Public Works Albany riverfront Albany Station Albany streets Albany traffic Albany urban renewal Andy Olson Benton County Benton County parks bicycling bike lanes Bowman Park Bryant Park Calapooia River CARA City of Albany climate change coronavirus COVID-19 Cox Creek path Crocker Lane cumberland church cycling Dave Clark Path DEQ downtown Albany Edgewater Village global warming gun control Highway 20 Interstate 5 Kitzhaber Linn County marijuana medical marijuana Millersburg North Albany North Albany Road Obama ODOT Oregon coast Oregon legislature Pacific Power Portland & Western Republic Services Riverside Drive Santiam Canal Talking Water Gardens The Banks Tom Cordier Union Pacific urban renewal Water Avenue Willamette River


Copyright 2020. All Rights Reserved. Hasso Hering.
Website Serviced by Santiam Communications
Hasso Hering