Part of pot tax is … secret? – Hasso Hering


A perspective from Oregon’s mid-Willamette Valley

Part of pot tax is … secret?

Written October 17th, 2017 by Hasso Hering

A sunset in Benton County, which got about $190,000 in the state’s first marijuana tax distribution.

Considering that the tax revenue from legal marijuana was an issue in last year’s local campaigns, you’d think the amount collected from local taxes would be of great and consuming interest. But this information remains hidden so far.

As reported last week, the Oregon Department of Revenue made its first distributions of marijuana tax income to local jurisdictions, and Albany received a little more than $185,000. Albany Finance Director Stewart Taylor told me the city got no breakdown of how much if any of that sum came from the local 3 percent tax on recreational marijuana sales and how much from the state’s 17 percent tax.

I asked the Revenue Department about this and heard from Joy Krawczyk, the communications operations manager there. “Due to confidentiality considerations, we aren’t able to disclose the total amount of the 3 percent local tax for any area we collect on behalf of,” she said by email. “However, the City of Albany may be able to provide that breakdown.”

Apparently not, however, as I mentioned.

There’s something else odd about this first distribution, as I discovered when Krawczyk provided the amounts sent to other mid-valley governments I asked her about. Remember that pot taxes are distributed to cities based on population and, after a certain date, the number of licensees.

The allocation to Corvallis was about $176,000. But Corvallis has a bigger population than Albany and allowed recreational marijuana sales sooner. So why would Corvallis get less marijuana tax than Albany? If somebody knows, I hope they’ll pass it on.

Linn County, by the way, received about $243,000 in marijuana taxes in the first go-around. Benton County got $190,000. The city of Lebanon received about $50,000, and Sweet Home $27,000.

The money is nice, obviously, but it’s not much compared to, say, the property tax, of which the city of Albany is levying $23.5 million this year in Linn County alone. (hh)

11 responses to “Part of pot tax is … secret?”

  1. Tony White says:

    …to say nothing of the new levy to pay for the school, fire, and police bonds that were passed. And now they’re asking us to approve a “public safety” levy. When will it end?

  2. John Hartman says:

    Adding up the numbers Hasso provides, we see that county and area cities absorbed $871-thousand cannabis tax dollars in this initial tranche of dough. If ODOR distributes tax monies on a quarterly basis, the annual dollar amount is $3,484,000.00, assuming pot sales do not increase over the initial period (unlikely)

    Other than the initial regulatory costs and occasional regulatory tweakings associated with city and county codes, local governmental agencies have little or no cost in the collection of this “easy money.” Perhaps the folks at the County Commission or at City Hall could spend some of the cannabis cash to investigate why ODOR feels a need for confidentiality.

    It begs the question: Is ODOR withholding Oregonians’ hard-paid pot taxes for unexplained reasons, or are the ODOR accountants simply too stoned, unable to do the math. Keep digging, Hasso. This story’s got legs.

    • HowlingCicada says:

      Confidentiality? Maybe it’s related to security problems and the overall creepiness caused by the industry being unable to use normal banking channels. Really stupid. Blame this one on various people in the Federal Govt. who want to keep the cannabis-criminality connection as a self-fulfilling prophecy. Jeff Sessions? The failed drug czar appointee who would rather have people on opioids? I’m sure there are plenty of Dems also responsible.

  3. Gordon L. Shadle says:

    Whose confidentiality is Joy trying to protect? If Joy is trying to protect the confidentiality of the City of Albany, then Stewart needs to call Joy and release her from this perceived obligation. A simple phone call from Stewart to Joy can accomplish this.

    If this “story’s got legs”, look at City Hall first.

  4. hj.anony1 aka hj annoy says:

    Seems to me this story does have legs….long, muscular, bike ridin’ legs. Go Hasso, Go!

    Why does a county that fought tooth and nail to deny the voters’ direction receive more $$ than the neighboring county that is more populated? Up is down, down is up.

    True head scratcher.

  5. ean says:

    Seems like Linn County shouldn’t get any money for banning sales.


Cycle around town!
Copyright 2020. All Rights Reserved. Hasso Hering.
Website Serviced by Santiam Communications
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!