A perspective from Oregon’s mid-Willamette Valley

Marijuana initiative: What’s in it

Written June 26th, 2014 by Hasso Hering
State police confiscated this pot: We'll likely vote on the stuff this fall.

State police confiscated this pot: We’ll likely vote on the stuff this fall.

So it looks as though we’ll be voting this fall on an initiative to create and regulate a legal industry supporting the recreational use of  marijuana. The sponsors turned in more than 145,000 signatures Thursday. They claimed to have checked many of them for their validity even before the state does the same, and they needed only 87,213. So now it’s time to look at what this measure would do.

The most striking feature is that the job of the Oregon Liquor Control Commission would be vastly increased. The agency, which now runs Oregon’s state liquor monopoly, would be charged with licensing growers, wholesalers, distributors and retailers of marijuana products. It would also be charged with enforcing the record-keeping requirements. Those are intended to make it possible for the state to collect taxes from the commerce in pot that the bill would encourage.

The taxes would be $35 per ounce of marijuana flowers, $10 per ounce of leaves and $5 per ounce of immature plants. The taxes due would be calculated at the time producers sell the products. Marijuana tax revenue would be distributed this way: 40 percent to the state’s common school fund, 20 percent to mental health or anti-drug programs, 15 percent to the state police, 20 percent to local law enforcement,  and 5 percent to the Oregon Health Authority.

Licensees would be barred from selling mature plants, and anyone else would be prohibited from possessing mature plants. Cities and counties could regulate the “nuisance aspects” of marijuana stores. But they could ban such stores only as the result of local initiatives to be put on the ballot if at least 10 percent of registered voters sign petitions.

Use of marijuana in public would be prohibited. Homegrown marijuana would be exempt from the licensing and tax requirements, but homegrown product could not be produced in public view. ID would be required to buy marijuana, and persons under 21 would be barred from buying or using it, similar to the existing law on alcohol. Research on driving under the influence of marijuana would have to be done. Exporting marijunana from Oregon, or importing it, would be illegal. The OLCC would impose minimum standards for marijuana quality. Homegrown marijuana extracts would be banned.

Offenses against these and other provisions would range from violations and misdemeanors to felonies. The medical marijuana law would not be affected.

Having read the 36-page initiative, and thinking of the stacks of regulations it would entail, our present marijuana laws seem a model of simplicity, even if they are often violated. The question is whether the added tax revenue is worth the vast new system of state regulation, licensing and potential penalties this initiative would create. (hh)

5 responses to “Marijuana initiative: What’s in it”

  1. Roger says:

    It looks like one gap in the allocation of proceeds is that it does not designate money to the OLCC for enforcement, which could make the enforcement component of the measure not worth the paper it is written on.

  2. Jim Clausen says:

    I’ll bet all those medical marijuana facilities are sweating the passing…

  3. Peg Richner says:

    Marijuana may possibly just be one of those rather harmless substances that are favored by a younger crowd but despised by the old folks, who far prefer their own substance, alcohol. We learned a hard and expensive lesson around Prohibition of alcohol. We have yet to learn that lesson around “illegal” drugs. I recommend we stop harassing and imprisoning people for their vices and instead addess any addiction problems in a humanitarian way.

  4. Jim Clausen says:

    Many of the “old folks” Peg mentions were the “young crowd” users of marijuana when it was introduced to the in the 60’s… That said, most of the “old folks” I know who had problems with illegal drugs back then – and know the accompanying dangers – will be voting against the legalizatin of marijuana…

    • Ray Kopczynski says:

      Just the opposite here… Most of the “old folks” I knew/know who inhaled — have had no problems whatsoever and I hope will be voting in favor.


HH Today: A perspective from Oregon’s mid-Willamette Valley
Albany Albany Carousel Albany City Council Albany council Albany downtown Albany Fire Department Albany housing Albany parks Albany Planning Commission Albany police Albany Post Office Albany Public Works Albany riverfront Albany Station Albany streets Albany traffic Albany urban renewal Andy Olson Benton County Benton County parks bicycling bike lanes Bowman Park Bryant Park Calapooia River CARA City of Albany climate change coronavirus COVID-19 Cox Creek path Crocker Lane cumberland church cycling Dave Clark Path DEQ downtown Albany Edgewater Village global warming gun control Highway 20 Interstate 5 Kitzhaber Linn County marijuana medical marijuana Millersburg North Albany North Albany Road Obama ODOT Oregon coast Oregon legislature Pacific Power Portland & Western Republic Services Riverside Drive Santiam Canal Talking Water Gardens The Banks Tom Cordier Union Pacific urban renewal Water Avenue Willamette River

Copyright 2020. All Rights Reserved. Hasso Hering.
Website Serviced by Santiam Communications
Hasso Hering