A perspective from Oregon’s mid-Willamette Valley

Lawmakers labor over weed; why?

Written May 15th, 2015 by Hasso Hering
A Senate committee is working on a marijuana bill that no one needs.

A Senate committee is now working on a marijuana bill that no one needs.

Nobody asked them, but Oregon legislators nevertheless want to change the law on marijuana. Mainly they want to construct an elaborate system of regulation and control. Apparently that would be on top of the regulations and tax system Measure 91 obliges the Oregon Liquor Control Commission to set up.

A joint House-Senate committee working on the weed issue gave up a few days ago when it could not agree on a plan to allow local governments to ban pot shops. Now the Senate has formed its own committee “to implement” Measure 91, even though the measure requires no additional laws.

The committee is considering Senate Bill 964. The first part of that bill has nothing to do with Measure 91. Instead, it “makes changes to (the) Oregon Medical Marijuana Act, including limiting (the) amount of plants that may be grown at addresses where marijuana grow sites are located and requiring registration of marijuana processing sites.” This is an attempt to control marijuana plantations that grow far more than their supposed medical clients can use and then sell the surplus across the country.

Further, the bill would allow cities and counties to prohibit “marijuana processing sites” as well as medical marijuana dispensaries. This part also allows city and county voters to vote on local measures on whether processing sites or dispensaries are allowed — as though the legislature can add or subtract to the constitutional right of the people to initiate or refer local ordinances.

In addition, the bill “provides for testing of all marijuana items in this state and requires laboratories that conduct testing to be licensed by the Oregon Health Authority.” And it “imposes requirements for labeling and packaging of all marijuana items.” Talk about covering everything with a heavy banket of government regulation and enforcement. What happened to the basic idea of decriminalizing a simple plant and letting people use it the way they want?

The bill seems superfluous or at least premature. Measure 91 was specific in allowing the private growing and use of marijuana and in calling for a system of licensing and taxing commercial marijuana operations. The liquor commission is supposed to set that up and has been working on it. The legislature should quit interfering and let the commission do its job. (hh)

3 responses to “Lawmakers labor over weed; why?”

  1. James Carrick says:

    I don’t know whether to laugh or cry. The way legislators and government officials are currently attempting to implement the passage of Measure 91 will virtually guarantee that the decades old, well established, marijuana “black market” will continue to thrive. Does anyone think people that use marijuana will pay more for legal (taxed) weed than the weed that they’ve been buying (sans taxes and regulation) up to this point? Once purchased, how will anyone be able to differentiate legal weed from black market weed?

    Public officials never saw a tax that they don’t like and this is no exception. Unintended consequences? Opportunism? Just more of government’s penchant for overthinking and over reaching? The outcome will be the same. They see big dollar signs but all they’re going to do is shoot themselves squarely in BOTH feet if they’re not very careful. Even with wise implementation, the black market will continue and anyone that doesn’t think so is fooling themselves. Government officials must think the public is stupid.

    I’ve always been a strong proponent of the “K.I.S.S. Method” and this is no exception. Measure 91 was relatively simple and the implementation of it should, AND COULD, mirror that. To the Oregon Legislature and the OLCC…..Keep It Simple, Stupid.

    • Peggy Richner says:

      It’s the purpose of government at all levels to tax and regulate, all under the guise of protecting the taxpayers who are to be mulcted. Yes, these so-called honorable “representatives” get cushy jobs in the process, but I suspect they also enjoy being able to tell others what to do. I’ll never understand why taxpayers continue to support them.

      • James Carrick says:

        At first I thought the word “mulcted” was a typo, Peggy…so I looked it up. No typo. PERFECT word for what government does to us every day. Think “milked.” :-)


HH Today: A perspective from Oregon’s mid-Willamette Valley
Albany Albany Carousel Albany City Council Albany council Albany downtown Albany Fire Department Albany housing Albany parks Albany Planning Commission Albany police Albany Post Office Albany Public Works Albany riverfront Albany Station Albany streets Albany traffic Albany urban renewal Andy Olson Benton County Benton County parks bicycling bike lanes Bowman Park Bryant Park Calapooia River CARA City of Albany climate change coronavirus COVID-19 Cox Creek path Crocker Lane cumberland church cycling Dave Clark Path DEQ downtown Albany Edgewater Village global warming gun control Highway 20 Interstate 5 Kitzhaber Linn County marijuana medical marijuana Millersburg North Albany Road Obama ODOT Oregon coast Oregon legislature Oregon passenger rail Pacific Power Portland & Western Republic Services Riverside Drive Santiam Canal Talking Water Gardens The Banks Tom Cordier Union Pacific urban renewal Water Avenue Willamette River

Copyright 2020. All Rights Reserved. Hasso Hering.
Website Serviced by Santiam Communications
Hasso Hering