SnowCreekMeadows.com - Finest Goat Milk Soap

HASSO HERING

A perspective from Oregon’s mid-Willamette Valley

Hands off the property tax cap

Written June 11th, 2014 by Hasso Hering
Visitors tour the Capitol, where the property  tax limit my become a target in 2015.

Visitors tour the Capitol, where the property tax limit my become a target in 2015.

The League of Oregon Cities plans to lobby the legislature next year for a constitutional amendment relaxing the limit on property taxes. Let’s hope lawmakers will resist the cities’ blandishments. Instead, they should give cities better tools to reduce their costs.

What troubles the league is the “compression” that results from voters approving more taxes than will fit under the constitutional cap for general government of $10 per $1,000 of assessed value. Now,  cities, counties and special districts sometimes get voters to approve levies in addition to their permanent tax rates. If those levies, added together, amount to more than $10 per thousand, the amounts billed to individual properties are reduced so that the owners don’t pay more than $10 per thousand. This compression of the tax rates means that the governments that levied the tax get less than the sum for which they had planned,

In a memo to city councils, the League of Oregon Cities said it “will continue to advocate for a constitutional amendment that gives local voters the opportunity to pass local option levies outside of compression. … This amendment would enable voters to determine the level of services they desire and the associated level of taxation,”

Nice try, guys. But no, this is not a good idea. First, because the tax limit is the only protection taxpayers have from the soaring rates that prompted the cap in the first place (via Measure 5 in 1990). And second, because property owners don’t necessarily have a vote in tax elections. (They don’t if they live elsewhere or if they’re a business.)

If tax elections were limited to people who pay the taxes, that would be one thing. But that’s not the case. In university towns, for example, students are urged to register and vote even though they never see a tax bill before they complete their studies and leave town.

There are other ways the legislature could help cities to meet their expenses, ways that don’t involve constitutional amendments requiring statewide elections. One is to reform the collective bargaining law that now allows outside arbitrators to decide — more or less arbitrarily, as the name implies — to force cities to pay public-safety employees more than they can afford. This happened to Albany, and now the fire department has to cut staffing even though voters approved a local levy.

The property tax system is a complicated mess. But for property owners, one thing that saves it from being a complete disaster is the limit on rates. Making it easier to exceed the limits would make the system even worse. (hh)

 



3 responses to “Hands off the property tax cap”

  1. Gordon L. Shadle says:

    I agree. Thankfully, tax limits are in the Oregon constitution and require statewide voter approval to be changed or removed. Constitutional tax limits are the best defense against a government that views our money as their money.

    I just wish temporary bond measures were subject to the same tax limitations. Unfortunately, they are not. So now we have new bond measures in the works from Albany, LBCC, and GAPS. all of which will hit taxpayers in the next 6-12 months. The prevailing government view is one of entitlement and permanence – the revenue stream from an expiring bond measure must be replaced with a new one.

    It’s time to stop the madness. Voting NO on bond measures is difficult. But turn them down we must to maintain fiscal sanity in our property tax system.

  2. Bill Kapaun says:

    Are the various “members” of “The League of Oregon Cities” funded by the taxpayers?
    IF so, what precedent gives them the right to use our tax dollars to “stick it to us” to a greater extent by lobbying the state govt?
    It REEKS of conspiracy. Maybe the taxpayers need to “conspire” to remove their city from this group.

  3. tom cordier says:

    I have seen no evidence that Albany political/staff class actually want to reduce the cost of Governance. The League is not a friend of taxpayers.
    The Book by Goldsmith “the twenty-first century city” is a road map for becoming competitive in urban America. The author is the former Mayor of Indianapolis. I’d suggest implementing some practices found in the book rather than embracing ideas from the League

 

 
Cycle around town!
Copyright 2018. All Rights Reserved. Hasso Hering.
Website Serviced by Santiam Communications
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!