HASSO HERING

A perspective from Oregon’s mid-Willamette Valley

Back-in parking on the wrong side

Written December 28th, 2016 by Hasso Hering
Calapooia Street on the west side of the post office will get driver's-side back-in parking.

Calapooia Street on the west side of the post office will get driver’s-side back-in parking.

Albany officials cite several benefits of the back-in diagonal parking that will be installed on three sides of the post office starting in January. They don’t mention the downside, which motorists will probably notice when they try to use the new setup.

The current issue of City Bridges, the city government’s newsletter, tells us: “Back-in angled parking creates significantly better visibility when pulling out of the space as the driver is looking forward into the lane and can see oncoming vehicles and bicycles without obstruction. Additional safety benefits come when car doors open; occupants of the vehicle can exit to the back of the vehicle toward the sidewalk and are shielded by the car doors instead of having to maneuver around them. This feature is especially beneficial for families with small children. Loading and unloading from the rear of a vehicle is also much easier with back-in parking as the trunk of the vehicle is facing the sidewalk.”

Note that most of the back-in spaces will be on the driver's side on the one-way streets around the Albany PO.

Note that most of the back-in spaces will be on the driver’s side on the one-way streets around the Albany PO.

That’s all fine. But only right-side angled parking offers better visibility. And on two of the three blocks where angled slots will be provided, they are on the left or driver’s side of the street.  This means that when the parking slot on your right is full and you pull out, you can see nothing of oncoming traffic until you’re in its lane. Even if the spot on your right is vacant, you can see traffic only if you twist your neck to look over your right shoulder, not that easy after a certain age.

From Sacramento to New York City, the online literature on angled parking is full of praises for the back-in kind. But there are cautions as well. Streetsblog.org shows this from one Todd Boulanger, who wrote seven years ago: “As a long time researcher (and photographer) and implementor of back-in diagonal (back-in oblique) parking, I have to add some suggestions … Try to avoid placing back-in angled parking on the driver’s side (left side in the U.S.) of a one-way street, as this layout reduces the ability of the driver to see oncoming traffic (and bicyclists) when pulling out.”

He also says there will be backlash from drivers, “especially the elderly who complain they cannot back into a space due to mobility issues…”  (Think of all those grandparents hoping to take their grandkids to the Albany Carousel.)

The new parking layout is part of Phase 1 of the city’s downtown streetscape project and is supposed to be finished in late March. It will yield 47 diagonal parking spaces on First, Calapooia and Second, each space 9 feet wide. That’s about 20 more spaces than now, and that will be helpful, especially when the Albany Carousel opens later in 2017. Phase 2, on several other downtown streets and not involving angled parking, will be done later in the year. Both phases together are expected to cost around $8 million.

When I reported on the back-in parking plan before, I suggested that Albany drivers start practicing. Where? Maybe in supermarket parking lots when nobody is around and you can drive against the painted arrows — to simulate left-side parking — without getting hit. (hh)

 

 



6 responses to “Back-in parking on the wrong side”

  1. John Hartman says:

    The nice people in both the Albany and Corvallis school districts who manage school bus driver-training programs shudder when they read Hasso’s excellent expose’ on the backing-in parking conundrum created by the addition of the CARA-Sell down on First Street.

    Why might they shudder? Because of the well-understood statistics on backing vehicles. While perhaps more true for large vehicles than for automobiles, the trend is the same. In the grand scheme of vehicular operations, the percentage of accidents when vehicles are backing-up is far greater even though cars, trucks and buses spend only 2% of their time backing.

    It doesn’t require any particular genius to understand. It is far more difficult to judge distance and space when looking in one’s rear view mirror. It becomes more challenging when the backing vehicle has one or more vehicles behind it, impatiently waiting for the vehicle to enter the parking space.

    Given this pattern around the downtown CARA-Sell, it seems certain we will have an increased number of fender benders and irritated drivers as vehicles struggle to back-in. Angry horn-blowers will enliven the downtown soundscape with various beeps, honks and curses. Ultimately, the decision to back-in to these spots will bring about an overall rise in auto insurance rates. Perhaps the City ought get into the insurance business.

  2. hj.anony1 says:

    Park bench a safe distance away? This will be some good people watching … downtown Albany edition.

  3. Tony White says:

    But the City has to figure out how to spend that CARA money somehow. I wonder how back-in parking is going to increase the tax value of adjacent properties so that we can recover the tax expenditures necessary to implement it…

  4. Mark says:

    Thank you Hasso for a second look at this parking plan. I hope our city officials will do the same.
    I propose a simple test to evaluate this layout.
    I request them to take three (city) vehicles to the east parking (#4) area at LBCC on a Saturday or Sunday.
    Access from Ellingson/Lanier Street. Then go the wrong way into the diagonal parking spots.
    Then the three cars just back-in park right next to each other. Then the first driver pulls out and parks the other side of the third car. Then the second car moves, parks a space away from the the just moved car #1. Now the third car can park between first and third. Now the drivers can get out and talk about their parking. One of the thinks to note is these diagonal parking spots there are just under/over ten feet wide. The plan around the Post Office is for nine feet wide. How would they do if there were others(kids) in their cars as they parked? I hope the parking plan is for thirty to fifty percent use of these spaces are for one time use visitors. What will their opinions be on parking in Albany? I may be full of bull in my writings, then again I’m looking forward to others to express theirs.

  5. Jeff Polkney says:

    I think it’s ironic the “back in” parking is around the post office as the post office letter carriers as a rule are strongly discouraged on backing up in their postal vehicles due to the many common dangers of backing up……

  6. GregB says:

    The width of these new parking spaces, like many new parking lots, are not wide enough for my full sized pickup. And, I’m supposed to back into these spots? And then try to open my door to get out of my vehicle without my door hitting the vehicle next to me? The pickup usually sits out at home in the driveway, but when I do put it in our garage, that has 9 foot wide doors, I have to fold the mirrors in and then it still is a very tight squeeze. People whine about discrimination for so many different things now days. These parking places appear to be discrimination against large vehicle owners. That’s my 2 cent comment.

 

 
Cycle around town!
Copyright 2019. All Rights Reserved. Hasso Hering.
Website Serviced by Santiam Communications
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!