A perspective from Oregon’s mid-Willamette Valley

900-foot ADUs: Albany amends its code

Written October 29th, 2020 by Hasso Hering

In an aerial from the city’s InfoHub map, this corner of South Albany looks pretty packed already, with little room for ADUs.

The long Albany council dispute over accessory dwelling units hit another milestone with the adoption of code amendments that make it official: These secondary units on single-family lots can be up to 900 square feet if they meet other requirements.

In a decision that ratified the outcome of an earlier vote, the council voted 5-1 Wednesday to adopt a package of changes to make the development code on ADUs comply with state law. The law leaves the size of ADUs up to local discretion, and 900 square feet, up from the previous limit of 750 feet, is the upper limit the council majority wanted.

Councilor Dick Olsen voted no. He urged Mayor Sharon Konopa to veto the change, as she did twice before, but she won’t. Olsen now is the lone opponent of the bigger ADU size, and under the city charter it takes two of the six council members to sustain a veto.

As the state law requires, the changes now adopted remove any ownership and off-street parking requirements for ADUs in Albany. Such units still must meet setback and height limits, and they can’t be bigger than half the footage of the primary house.

In the ADU debate over the last two or three years, opponents had worried that relaxing the city’s requirements would destroy established neighborhoods with a slew of additional units, causing streets to be clogged with parked cars, and that developers would buy and tear down old single houses and replace them with two.

Most Albany houses, especially in the newer sections, appear to be built on lots too small for an extra unit.

As for lots and houses in the historic districts, adding an ADU there (as I read the amended code) involves “historic review” as an additional step before getting a building permit. That might slow down any rush to plaster the old town with backyard units even where they could be shoehorned in. (hh)

4 responses to “900-foot ADUs: Albany amends its code”

  1. Mr. Walter Monteith says:

    Do you know what this “historic review” would entail? Would it be the same situation with the homes on 4th and Calapooia where a developer could bully their way into getting what they want? I hope not. Such a crime — destroying historic downtown.

    • Bill Kapaun says:

      It’s called slum removal.

    • Cheryl P says:

      The houses at 4th and Calapooia were beyond repair. Honestly, when you have to take a building down to the studs with little to no salvageable materials to be used…exactly what ‘history’ are you preserving?

  2. Mr Patrick Henry says:

    As much as the Nom deplume may suggest, you seem to be more aligned with Karl Marx attitude of “government owns everything” which I find to be abhorrent.


HH Today: A perspective from Oregon’s mid-Willamette Valley
Albany Albany Carousel Albany City Council Albany council Albany downtown Albany Fire Department Albany housing Albany parks Albany Planning Commission Albany police Albany Post Office Albany Public Works Albany riverfront Albany Station Albany streets Albany traffic Albany urban renewal Andy Olson Benton County Benton County parks bicycling bike lanes Bowman Park Bryant Park Calapooia River CARA City of Albany climate change coronavirus COVID-19 Cox Creek path Crocker Lane cumberland church cycling Dave Clark Path Daylight saving time downtown Albany Edgewater Village global warming gun control Highway 20 Interstate 5 Kitzhaber Linn County marijuana medical marijuana Millersburg North Albany Road Obama ODOT Oregon coast Oregon legislature Oregon passenger rail Pacific Power Portland & Western Republic Services Riverside Drive Santiam Canal Talking Water Gardens The Banks Tom Cordier Union Pacific urban renewal Water Avenue Willamette River

Copyright 2020. All Rights Reserved. Hasso Hering.
Website Serviced by Santiam Communications
Hasso Hering